SEXISME et DROITS des FEMMES / SEXISM and WOMEN'S RIGHTS : Bulletin 2003 - 27

 

Cher-e-s ami-e-s, dear friends,
Ci-joint quelques courriers. There is some news.
Merci de prévenir si vous ne souhaitez plus en recevoir;
Thanks for sending an e-mail if you want to cancel :
mailing-liste-unsubscribe@sos-sexisme.org

Sororalement. Sisterly yours.

Mail :
sexisme@sos-sexisme.org
URL : http://www.sos-sexisme.org

Forum / Newsgroup :
http://www.sos-sexisme;org/forum/BulletinBoard.asp

 

SEXISME et DROITS des FEMMES / SEXISM and WOMEN'S RIGHTS : Bulletin 2003 - 27

Turkey / Turquie : Urgent appeal ! Action urgente !

Solidarité / Solidarity !

 
1 - France : Témoignage contre le port du voile islamique
2 - Spain : Women and domestic violence
3 - Sweden : cVurt battles for equal pay
4 - Slovakia : Council of Europe Finds Evidence of Forced Sterilization of Romani Women in Slovakia
5 - Uzbekistan : Polygamy in Central Asia 
6 - Egypt May Soon Permit Women to Confer Citizenship
7 - Morocco : Women MPS, associations support family law reforms proposed by Moroccan king 
8 - Korea : SK Women Want Equal Rights in Divorce
9 - Alaska Court Protects Young Women's Right to Abortion
10 - Argentina : Liberaron al violador de ROMINA TEJERINA
 

Europe : Les femmes et la Conférence intergouvernementale 2003 / STATEMENT OF THE EUROPEAN WOMEN’S LOBBY

International : Campagne internationale de SOS SEXISME ! International Campaign !

History
*
One hundred years of struggle
* Nepal : Stories of women
* Pornography ? NO !

Conference / Meeting
*
Afghanistan : Conférence en solidarité avec les femmes
* Europe : Colloque Femmes et sciences

Nouvel An / New Year


 

***



Turkey / Turquie : Urgent appeal ! Action urgente !

The International Secretariat of OMCT requests your URGENT intervention in the following situation in Turkey.

New Information

The International Secretariat of OMCT has received updated information from a reliable source concerning the rape and torture of Ms. Gülbahar Gündüz an executive member of the Women's Section of DEHAP Istanbul, a political party in Turkey.

According to the information received, legal and administrative institutions began two separate investigations on the case. The Istanbul Security Directorate lifted the administrative investigation about claims by Gülbahar Gündüz, who says she was raped by men who claimed to be civilian police officers. The Security Directorate stated that the reason for lifting the investigation was that "no security official is in the position of defendant."

It is reported that this decision is against the law and was politically motivated and that fake documents were prepared about the incident.

OMCT is concerned that the lifting of the administrative investigation results may constitute a lack of due diligence on the part of the government of Turkey to adequately investigate, prosecute and punish state-sponsored violence against women. (...)

OMCT continues to be gravely concerned for the psychological and physical integrity of Ms. Gündüz and calls on the government of Turkey to ensure an effective, impartial investigation into these allegations. OMCT is also deeply troubled by the sex-specific nature of the torture and the targeting of women political activists because they are women, and would like to highlight that it has received other reports of torture of women, as detailed in OMCT's recent alternative report on violence against women in Turkey to the Committee Against Torture. OMCT recalls that Turkey is a State Party to international instruments that prohibit and punish torture and violence against women, including the Convention against Torture and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.

Action requested :
The International Secretariat of OMCT asks you to keep up writing to the authorities in Turkey urging them to:
i. guarantee the physical and psychological integrity of Gülbahar Gündüz;
ii. ensure an immediate, impartial investigation of the allegations of torture and rape arising from the incident on June 14, 2003, and ensure the prosecution and punishment of those found responsible in front of an impartial tribunal;
iii. guarantee adequate reparation and protection from future attacks for Ms. Gündüz;
iv. guarantee the respect of human rights and the fundamental freedoms throughout Turkey in accordance with international human rights standards.

Addresses:
· Mr Ahmet Necdet Sezer, President of the Turkish Republic, Cumhur Baskanligi, 06 100, Ankara / Turkey, Fax: 00 90312 427 1330
· Minister of the Interior, Mr Abdulkadir Aksu, Ministry of Interior, Icisleri Bakanligi, 06644 Ankara, Turkey, Fax: + 90 312 418 17 95
· Minister of Justice, Mr Cemil €icek, Ministry of Justice, Adalet Bakanligi, 06659 Ankara, Turkey, Fax: + 90 312 418 5667
· State Minister with responsibility for Human Rights, Mr Ertugrul Yalcinbayir, Office of the Prime Minister, Basbakanlik, 06573 Ankara, Turkey, Fax: + 90 312 417 04 76
· Ambassadeur, Sungar, Murat, Ch. du Petit-Saconnex 28b - CP 271, CH- 1211, Genève 19, Suisse, e-mail : mission.turkey@ties.itu.int, fax: +4122 734 08 59

Please also write to the embassies of Turkey in your respective country.

Geneva, October 28, 2003
Kindly inform us of any action undertaken quoting the code of this appeal in your reply.
 

 

***

 

Solidarité / Solidarity

AIDEZ-NOUS !
Que ce soit dans le Pool au Congo-Brazzaville, le Lofa au Liberia ou en Ituri, les centres de santé, lorsqu'ils existent encore, sont détruits, ravagés par la guerre. Nos équipes découvrent alors des populations totalement abandonnées, dépourvues de tout et privées de soins vitaux. 
Avec 60 euros, nous pouvons acheter médicaments et matériel pour assurer pendant un mois les soins de base à 500 personnes
.

Pour faire un don par courrier, par téléphone ou en ligne, cliquez ici:
http://msf.cabestan.com/Go/index.cfm?WL=36&WS=74131_74190&WA=58
Merci de votre soutien.

From : "Médecins Sans Frontières" <msf@cabestan.com> (Newsletter MSF No 92)

 

*** 




1 - France : Témoignage contre le port du voile islamique

Le foulard, comme le l'islam néo-communautaire, est loin d'être une question purement française : il fait débat en Allemagne, en Espagne et en Italie et énormément en Afrique, où le prosélytisme bat son
plein. On voit apparaître, depuis cinq ou dix ans, des pressions importantes obligeant des musulmanes qui allaient jusqu¹ici tête nue à se voiler, dans les villes comme dans les campagnes. Je tiens ces
témoignages à votre disposition : elles proviennent des femmes maliennes, camerounaises et nigérianes. 
On peut se pencher sur le pourquoi de ce néo-islamisme chez les jeunes. Cependant, face aux montées extrémistes, l'explication n'est pas notre seul devoir. Il faut aussi trouver le moyen de les contrer.
On peut se demander sans fin pourquoi le viol, pourquoi l'oppression, pourquoi moi ?. C'est important, mais ce n'est pas suffisant. Peut-être faut-il en effet se méfier des récupérations politiques, ou des  attitudes de rejet. La passion serait-elle pour autant coupable ? Je ne crois pas : elle s'explique notamment par le lien étroit qui existe avec la revendication (et l'obligation) du voile, et le contexte de violence et de viols dont les jeunes filles issues de l'immigration et plus largement toutes celles qui vivent dans des quartiers ghettos sont la proie. Parler du voile, c'est parler du viol. Et réussir à se faire entendre.
Toutes les formes d'exclusion conduisent à des replis dits identitaires ou religieux,
il ne s'agit pas de justifier l'une par l'autre, mais de lutter à la fois contre l'une et l'autre. (...) Je tiens à dire par ailleurs que je ne m'identifie pas, moi, à la société blanche, (...) Je l'affirme d'autant mieux que le catholicisme a rendu mon père à moitié dingue, et que le fondamentalisme chrétien est en train de remettre gravement en cause les droits des femmes à l'avortement et à la contraception, aux Etats-Unis et dans le monde entier. Les kippas et les croix peuvent être acceptées. Pas par moi. Pas à l'école. Et même si je pense que le rapport n'est pas strictement équivalent entre une croix et un voile noir, je ne me sens redevable ni personnellement ni collectivement envers celles (et surtout ceux pour celles) qui le revendiquent au nom du droit à la différence. Le différentialisme ne me paraît pas un moyen d'émancipation, pas plus que le communautarisme.
Je me rappelle que tous les fascismes ont un fond d'exclusion, de racisme et d'humiliation
. Dans le Nord sinistré, 34 % des gens votent pour Le Pen : va-t-on leur dire que leur exclusion (le mot est faible) leur donne le droit d'être racistes et violents, ou affirmer qu'interdire les propos racistes va les encourager à le devenir encore plus? C'est une option. Je ne la partage pas.
Revendiquer son oppression, s'y enfermer, c'est évidemment le stade suprême de l'aliénation. On la voit notamment à l'oeuvre sur la question de la prostitution un autre débat passionnel en France où s'opposent absolument les mêmes arguments. Le voile ici ne serait pas le même qu'en Iran, en Algérie ou ailleurs ? Quelle drôle d'idée.
D'abord le corps est un corps. Avec ce genre de raisonnement, on en viendrait vite à dire que l'excision fait moins mal ici qu'en Afrique (ou plus ?) d'ailleurs plusieurs l'affirment, de tous bords. On ne peut pas non plus faire l'impasse sur ce qui se passe ailleurs, car cet ailleurs, tel un furet, passe et repasse par ici : il porte le doux nom de mondialisation. Et même si la dramatisation du voile comme étendard intégriste est parfois exagérée, il serait grave de rester aveugle à ce mouvement régressif massif dont le fondamentalisme islamique est loin, hélas, de constituer l'unique aspect, en France et ailleurs. Il faudrait peut-être arrêter de s'en tenir à des schémas politiques rigides : je ne suis pas l'oppresseur et l'autre l'opprimée. Non. Je refuse cette bipolarisation du monde : personne, nulle part, sous aucun prétexte, n'a le droit de réduire l'Autre, la femme, de lui dire que son corps est honteux, de l'en convaincre, y compris en lui faisant croire qu'ainsi (super loto !) elle ne sera pas violée dans une cave. Les frontières les plus étanches sont dans les têtes. Les illusions, nous nous en faisons tous et toutes. Ça aide à vivre et je n'ai pas envie de m'en moquer.
Mais qui oserait affirmer aujourd'hui que le foulard, à l'école, n'est pas une croisade des fondamentalistes ? Il suffit de lire Hanifa Cherifi pour s'en convaincre : il n'y a ni anecdote, ni futilité dans la volonté de rester voilée même à l'école. Et l'affaire d'Aubervilliers vient fort à propos pour nous faire oublier cet essentiel là. Les fondamentalistes ne sont pas des abrutis. Au Nigeria, quand une femme, Amina Lawal, est acquittée, les juges s'empressent de condamner un homme pour sodomie à la lapidation, exactement dans les mêmes conditions, en espérant que personne ne se mobilisera. Il sera si facile, ensuite, de tordre la justice sous prétexte de symétrie, et de condamner de nouveau des femmes ! Il ne faut jamais lâcher sur rien. Jamais. Par ailleurs, il est faux de dire qu'on (le fameux on) impose des devoirs sans accorder de droits.
L'égalité des droits est inscrite dans la loi. Que la société ne soit pas conforme au droit, c'est à déplorer, mais ce n'est pas un reproche à adresser à la République. Encore une fois, je ne suis pas du côté du manche dans cette histoire : ce monde s'impose à moi, je n'en suis ni le maître ni la maîtresse (certains dans mon entourage disent même que c'est tant mieux), j'ai le droit et j'en use de contester toutes les inégalités, et je n'en vois pas de plus inégales que d'autres. Le féminisme a rencontré de nombreuses limites dans son histoire (dont j'avoue que je suis loin de tout connaître). On a
d'abord prétendu que la lutte des classes libérerait les femmes, et nous avons attendu les deux libérations avec le succès que l'on sait.

L'antiracisme est en passe de remplacer cet obstacle politique : on n'aurait pas le droit d'exister en tant que femme, de mettre, en tant que féministe, la question de l'égalité homme-femme en premier dans l'échelle de nos priorités, avant d'avoir liquidé la colonisation, le racisme, les discriminations ? Et tout ça parce que des hommes (oui, massivement des hommes) ont colonisé le monde ? J'y étais pas, moi, en 1900 en Algérie. Mais je suis femme ici et aujourd'hui.
Comme femme également, je ne suis pas convaincue par l'idée que seule la discrimination me ferait exister dans mon sexe. Bien d'autres choses, heureusement, me font exister. A commencer par le désir d'avoir un sexe et de m'en servir librement. Et d'aller tête nue dans le vent. Tous voiles dehors.

Elise Thiébaut

 

***

 

 
2 - Spain : Women and domestic violence
 

Spain has adopted a wide range of measures aimed at protecting women from domestic violence. But with the number of fatalities threatening to break records this year, Spanish women's groups say the legislation falls far short of what is needed.

Women protesting Spain’s parliament

MADRID, Spain (WOMENSENEWS)

It was largely thanks to Ana Orantes--to her death by burning, to be precise--that gender violence in Spain finally burst into the public's awareness.

It was 1997 and, at the age of 60, Orantes mustered the courage to appear on a TV show and testify to decades of brutal beatings by her husband. She had been unable to get a restraining order despite dozens of complaints to the police.

Several days after the show was aired, Orantes was dead. Her husband had beaten her badly, one last time. Then he doused her with gasoline and lit a match.

Now, six years later, the Spanish parliament has unanimously passed legislation that just might have saved Orantes' life, had it been in force back then.

The "Order for the Protection of Victims of Domestic Violence" gives battered women the option of getting a fast-track restraining order on a violent partner within a maximum of 72 hours.

Since the law went into force in late summer, 1,390 women have sought protection under the order, according to the Madrid-based Woman's Institute, a government policy-making body. Local authorities in Madrid say that about 20 women a day apply for the order.

Woman's Institute director Miriam Tey de Salvador says the order is part of a larger package of legal measures sponsored by the conservative government of Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar Lopez. The measures have redefined domestic violence as a crime rather than a misdemeanor, allowing tougher penalties and quicker custody for suspected aggressors.

Since 1997, says Tey, the number of shelters for battered women has increased from 159 to more than 260 today, and there's been a doubling of help desks at police stations and courthouses.

Economic and job assistance has also been approved for victims who have to leave their home "and this year more than 1,000 women will benefit from this help," Tey says in an e-mail response to queries from Women's eNews.

While women's groups have welcomed the measures, some say they are being slighted by Aznar's administration.

The protection order, they say, was the boiled-down result of a much broader initiative last year by an array of parliamentary factions urging a Comprehensive Law on Gender Violence. (...)

Abused Women May Be Overcoming Fears

Measures such as these only add to the shattered hopes since the Congress of Deputies, Spain's parliament, set up a Gender Violence Commission last fall to study the Comprehensive Law proposal.

The idea had been to include wide-ranging legal measures such as steps to combat sexual harassment on the workplace, reduce trafficking in women and require educational programs against gender prejudice.

Even the Order for Protection is weakened by the lack of enforcement measures and the 72-hour, or three-day, required response time, according to Alemany of the lawyers association.

"Three days are a long time for a victim to live with her aggressor," she says, adding that her organization had proposed adopting the Austrian model which calls for an immediate response.

(...) Nevertheless, Tey agrees with some activists that the increase in cases of domestic violence "is a sign that abused women are overcoming their fears."

By : Jerome Socolovsky (journalist based in Madrid).


For more information:
http://themis.matriz.net/home.html
http://www.separadasydivorciadas.org
http://www.mtas.es/mujer/principal.htm

***



 
3 - Sweden : cVurt battles for equal pay
 
 

Even in the country with the world’s highest number of female cabinet ministers, the gender gap is not closed in the workplace

Despite an Equal Opportunities Act passed in 1979, Swedish women earn 15 to 20 per cent less than men. Five years ago, an economist won her case, proving that she took home less than her male counterparts in the same borough, although her responsibilities and education were identical. But when it comes to comparing different jobs deemed of equal value, the task is much more complex.
In 1995, almost 400 Stockholm area nurses lodged a wage discrimination complaint with their Equal Opportunities Ombudsman. Because cases are dealt with on an individual basis, three different proceedings were filed in the Labour Court. A fourth was filed separately in 1996 by two midwives from Orebro county council, in southern Sweden.
Five years down the line, none of these cases has been resolved. The nurses and midwives claim that their work is of equal value to that of male medical technicians, but that their wages are about 15 per cent lower. The former look after hospital apparatus and require less education.
The case has revolved around job evaluations. The midwives’ employers maintain that there is no salary gap between the two work categories since they receive compensation for night shifts and work four hours less. The medical technicians work days only. The Ombudsman has argued that basic monthly wages should be compared, not those taking compensation for shift work into account. The Labour Court turned to the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg, which ruled in April that basic salaries should be compared, taking the case back to the Swedish court.
“The most significant thing about these cases is that they are all focusing on the difference in pay between different professions, one dominated by women, one by men. How do you prove that work is of equal value? There is no precedent in our court about this,” explains Raija Lounavaara, of the Equal Opportunities office.
If the nurses and midwives win their respective cases, their employers will be held liable for damages. It does not follow that the 400 nurses who filed complaints in 1995 will benefit. “But rulings stating that these persons have been discriminated against will send a very important message to trade unions and employers,” said Lounavaara. Nevertheless, the nurses’ union does not support the court cases which break with the Swedish tradition of collective agreements. It argues that wages are best set through negotiation and by relying on market forces, given the shortage of nurses. Since 1995, the union has strengthened this negotiating process and obtained the sharpest wage hikes on the labour market.

By : Elisabet Ornerborg, swedish journalist, with Lag&Atval, a magazine specialized in labour issues
http://www.unesco.org/courier/2000_06/uk/doss14.htm

 
 
 
***
 
 
 

4 - Slovakia : Council of Europe Finds Evidence of Forced Sterilization of Romani Women in Slovakia
 
Commissioner for Human Rights Calls on Slovak Government to Accept Responsibility for Failing to Protect Women from Illegal Sterilizations and to Enact Laws to End Practice

On October 29, the Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe concluded that "it can reasonably be assumed" that Romani women in Slovakia were sterilized without their informed consent as documented in a human rights report released earlier this year by the Center for Reproductive Rights and Poradna pre obcianske a ludské práva, a Slovak human rights group. The Commissioner released its Recommendation one day after the Slovak government issued its own report denying that illegal sterilizations occured. The Commissioner found that the Slovak government's investigation "is unlikely ... [to] shed full light on the sterilization practices" because of the intimidating atmosphere created by law enforcement officials who, throughout the investigation, have threatened and intimidated victims, witnesses and human rights defenders.

"The Commissioner for Human Rights’ conclusions call into question the Slovak government’s denial of the sterilization of Romani women without their informed consent," said Christina Zampas, the Center for Reproductive Rights’ Legal Adviser for Europe. "The Slovak government should take full responsibility for these human rights abuses."

The Slovak government should accept its "objective responsibility for failing to ensure that no sterilizations were performed without free and informed consent, as required by international human rights instruments" and "redress should include compensation and an apology" for the victims, according to the Commissioner for Human Rights. The Commissioner also called for rapid adoption of a new law requiring free and informed consent for medical procedures, including sterilizations, in line with international legal standards.

The Commissioner’s report also calls on the Slovak government to guarantee the basic right of patients to access their medical files, which the Commissioner notes has made it difficult for many Romani women victims to bring cases to court. "The Slovak government must cease all efforts to prevent the victims of forced or coerced sterilization from seeking their right to legal redress and enact laws that will put an end to this horrible practice," said Barbora Bukovská, Executive Director of Poradna.

Body and Soul: Forced Sterilization and Other Assaults on Roma Reproductive Freedom in Slovakia documented 110 cases of Romani women who were forcibly and coercively sterilized in public hospitals in eastern Slovakia. It also exposed other violations of Romani women’s rights such as verbal and physical abuse, segregation in maternity wards and other racially discriminatory standards of care, misinformation in health matters, and denial of patient access to medical records. The report is based on interviews with Romani women, non-Romani women, obstetricians, gynecologists, hospital administrators and government officials that took place in eastern Slovakia in 2002.

To obtain a copy of the Commissioner for Human Rights’ Recommendation visit: http://www.coe.int/T/E/Commissioner_H.R/Communication_Unit/Documents/CommDH(2003)12_E.asp#TopOfPage

http://www.reproductiverights.org/pr_03_1030slovakia.html

 

 

***

 

 
5 - Uzbekistan : Polygamy in Central Asia 
 
31 October 2003: In Soviet times, polygamy was prohibited by law. What has happened in the years of independence in the former Central Asian republics of the USSR? (Women's Resource Centre Tashkent)

Nataliya Bushueva says, “Polygamist marriages in Uzbekistan are prohibited by law."  Nonetheless, it has become a widespread phenomenon. As a worker of WRC, Barno Valieva, claims the cause of many cases is in women themselves. They believe that it is better to be a second wife that a lonely woman. Barno Valieva says that polygamy is especially high in provinces in Uzbekistan.
“He did not call me a second wife. He just called me wife.” The woman that wished to remain incognito has been in marriage concluded on the basis of the religious rite “Nikoh” for 10 years. This marriage has no legal force. To conclude this rite it is enough to have two witnesses.
“I was perfectly aware that he was hiding it from me. He concealed this fact for a long time. Only when our daughter was five, his parents learnt about my existence.”
As this woman said, she took this plunge because she did not to be lonely. Before this marriage she had already had a child. A single woman with a child is condemned by our society. However, she believes, there is little good in such marriages. The [behaviour] of her husband was unbearable. “He used to live with us for months; but later he forgot us for months.”
Formally, a mullah has no right to perform the religious rite “Nikoh”, if a man and a woman are in official marriage already. But this rule is always violated. Polygamy is subject to criminal penalty. The law envisages either a fee reaching 50 to 100 minimal salaries, or an improvement labor and imprisonment up to 3 years – everything depends on a specific case. To prove a polygamous marriage is very difficult. the law states that this marriage can be considered such if a man and a woman have a common household. If he cohabits with her without having a common household, this living together cannot be considered a marriage, because in this case it is no crime.
How do the Uzbek residents treat polygamy? The members of Uzbek Resource Center polled 100 women, their age ranging from 18 to 60 of this number, 20 were for polygamy and 78 were against.
As Uzbekistani researchers write, the number of polygamists is constantly increasing in Uzbekistan. However, there is no statistic that could help to judge about the scale of polygamy. However, experts state that this form of marriage has never been popular in Uzbekistan. Rather, it was a whim of the well-off stratum of population. As to the present-day situation, there is even a separate category of women, who poll for conclusion of such marriages. But these women are more likely to be moved by a desire for material well-being.”

Polygamy also takes place in Turkmenistan, but the situation there is significantly different from that in Uzbekistan. More detail is in a report prepared by Viktoria Rodionova:
“Turkmenistan is the only state in the post-Soviet state, where polygamy is officially permitted. A man can have up to four wives. However, to conclude a second, third and fourth marriages a man has to submit all kinds of certificates and documents proving his financial solvency. This man is obliged to provide an adequate living for all his wives and children. If the local administration is satisfied by the presented proof, it issues permission for marriage. It is possible to state that for Turkmenistan the so-called bigamy is traditional. It is known that in Turkmen society marriage between a young man and a girl is usually concluded on the agreement of their parents. Few dare go against the will of their parents. Therefore, it happens that a man has one wife that he “was married” to and the second wife that he selected himself. Such a situation is normal for the present-day Turkmenistan: a man lives for two families. In both of them his children grow, who, as a rule, communicate with each other, go to one and the same school and have one and the same family name.”

Solto Temir gives more detail about the situation with polygamy, “As sociologists note, bigamy was widespread in pre-revolutionary Kyrgyzstan. However, in the modern society this phenomenon is quite frequent. A large number of cases are known when men have second wives without divorcing from the first one. In the case, the marriage is not registered in the Registrar’s office, but is concluded in the mosque. In these cases has two wives living with them in turns, by the agreement of the sides. It is noteworthy that the question of the polygamy is repeatedly raised by male deputies. During the last debate in the parliament devoted to giving polygamy the official status, only four votes were lacking to pass the law."

http://wluml.org/english/newsfulltxt.shtml?cmd[157]=x-157-27199%20&cmd[189]=x-189-27199


 

 

***    

 
6 - Egypt May Soon Permit Women to Confer Citizenship
 
(...) On Sept. 28, President Hosni Mubarak closed the annual ruling party conference with a number of announcements, including a rather vaguely worded statement that the Interior Ministry would begin processing citizenship applications for children of Egyptian mothers and foreign fathers. If the president's assurances are actually implemented, Egyptian women will gain the historic right to pass their nationality on to their children. Until now, nationality could only be conferred by the father.

The president also said that parliamentary preparations would begin for a new citizenship law allowing mothers to confer nationality on their children. If the government places too many conditions on the citizenship applications--as many advocates fear--hopes will turn toward this new law which could face parliament at the earliest by spring.

More than a quarter million Egyptian women are married to non-Egyptians and they have more than a million children who until now were not eligible for citizenship. A few days after the announcement the press reported that an estimated 1,000 mothers had already gone to the Mugamma to start the process and there have been thousands more since. (...)

Plans to Pursue Issue in Court
Also for male children of Egyptian mothers and foreign fathers, it is very difficult to get married, since few Egyptian parents want their daughter's children to suffer the same stigma.
Organizations such as the Association for the Development and Enhancement of Women, however, are not relying solely in the parliament, but are also using the courts.
"We are working on all roads, the case in front of the Constitutional Court has been there for a long time," said Qabeel, referring to an ongoing lawsuit to declare the 1975 law unconstitutional. Since the Egyptian constitution grants men and women equal rights, the plaintiffs argue that mothers should have the right to pass on their citizenship to their children.
The government-formed National Council for Women in Egypt, chaired by the country's first lady, Suzanne Mubarak, has been pushing strongly to address this issue. This has earned the grudging respect of independent women's nongovernmental organizations that had initially distrusted the council.
Paul Schemm has been working as journalist in Cairo since 1998 and is the editor of the Cairo Times.

For more information : Association for the Development and Enhancement of Women - (In English and Arabic): -
http://www.adewegypt.org/ The National Council for Women in Egypt - (In English and Arabic): - http://www.ncw.gov.eg/new-ncw/english/index.jsp

By Paul Schemm - WeNews correspondent / womensenewstoday@womensenews.org
 
 

 

***

 

 

7 - Morocco : Women MPS, associations support family law reforms proposed by Moroccan king 
 
Morocco, Politics, 11/1/2003

Several women associations and women parliament members have voiced support to the proposed family law (Mudawana) reforms announced by the Moroccan king on October 10, describing the amendments as "an initiative that would contribute to the edification of a modernist and democratic society."

These reforms put family under the joint responsibility of spouses, make polygamy almost impossible and re-organize marriage and divorce regulations.

The 35 Women members of the House of Representatives said in a message to the king the proposed reforms are a "landmark" that does justice to women, preserve men's dignity and protect children's interests.

The reforms reflect the king's resolve to promote the situation of women while respecting the principles of Islam, they said.

For their part, several women associations called the reforms a "victory" for Morocco and an evidence to a strong political will to halt the injustice toward Moroccan women.

The new initiative giving more rights to both men and women will definitely have a positive impact on families, said the associations in a message addressed to the king.

The national coordination commission of women associations said the reforms meet the aspirations of Moroccan citizens and enhance justice, equity and equality in conformity with the teachings of Islam and international conventions. The commission also hailed the sovereign's decision to refer the family law proposals to parliament

 

 
 
 
***
 
 
 

8 - Korea : SK Women Want Equal Rights in Divorce
 
SEOUL (Reuters) -- Kim Min-hee, a 31-year-old working mother, never thought about South Korean family law until she decided to end her seven-year marriage. Having fled with her two sons from a violent husband, Kim -- not her real name -- wants to change a decades-old law to give her children equal rights. "After the divorce, my sons and I will not be in the same family legally. Even though I am allowed to raise them, we are considered to be just living together in a house," Kim told Reuters at a rally in Seoul against the "ho-ju" system. Ho-ju literally means head of the family or household.

In practice, it defines family structure through male lines, giving men privileges and disadvantaging women, notably in divorce. The country has one of the highest divorce rates. The law emerged under Japanese colonial rule in the first half of the 20th century. Hitherto, Koreans had defined family structure through male and female lines. For more than 40 years, opponents of ho-ju have said South Korea is one of the few countries to discriminate in this way.

President Roh Moo-hyun, a former human rights lawyer, promised in last year's election campaign to abolish ho-ju, but traditionalists oppose this. When a couple marries, the government registers them as one family. The groom becomes the bride's new ho-ju, or household head, instead of her father. The bride keeps her father's family name, but the lack of a smile on a bride's face symbolizes the switch in loyalty. If the husband dies, the next ho-ju is their son and then any grandson. Inheritance is divided equally, regardless of gender. But in divorce, the woman is removed from her husband's family records. Children from the marriage remain firmly in those records -- even if they live with the mother.



***

 
 
 
 
9 - Alaska Court Protects Young Women's Right to Abortion
 
Alaska Court Protects Young Women's Right to Abortion
Parental Consent Law Struck Down

On October 13, an Alaska state judge struck down a law that required young women under the age of 17 to obtain the consent of a parent or a judge before having an abortion. Superior Court Judge Sen K. Tan ruled that the law violated teens’ rights to equal protection under the state’s constitution because it requires them to involve a parent only in their decision to have an abortion, not in other medical decisions such as carrying a pregnancy to term. The courts have blocked enforcement of the law since its enactment in 1997.

"The risks to the health of the mother that are associated with pregnancy and childbirth are higher than the risks associated with abortion," wrote Judge Tan. "If the purpose of the Act is to protect the health of pregnant minors, it is incongruous to burden the decision to choose the safer procedure, but allow minors to choose the more dangerous course without parental consent."

"The court has recognized that this law discriminates against the reproductive rights of young women and violates the Alaska Constitution," said Janet Crepps, Staff Attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights and lead counsel on the case. "For some young women, speaking with parents about abortion means facing physical and emotional abuse. This law not only denies young women their constitutional rights, but also puts them in a situation where they could be seriously harmed or forced to carry a pregnancy to term against their will."

The Plaintiff’s attorneys presented extensive evidence at trial showing that most minors—especially younger ones—inform at least one parent or family member of a planned abortion. Many minors who don’t involve a parent voluntarily consult another adult, such as a grandparent or older sibling. Those who sidestep their parents are often motivated by fear of abuse, violence or pressure to continue the pregnancy to term. For battered teenagers and incest survivors in particular, mandatory parental involvement laws increase the risks of an already dangerous situation.

In 1998, Judge Tan granted the Plaintiff’s petition to strike down the law without a trial and ruled that the Alaska Parental Consent Act and Judicial Authorization Act was unconstitutional. The Alaska Supreme Court reversed that decision and ordered that the state of Alaska be allowed to present evidence in the case.

Janet Crepps and Suzanne Novak of the Center for Reproductive Rights and Jeffrey Feldman and Julie Rikelman of Feldman & Orlansky represent the plaintiffs in Planned Parenthood of Alaska et al. vs. State of Alaska. Plaintiffs include Planned Parenthood of Alaska and Jan Whitefield, M.D.

http://www.reproductiverights.org/pr_03_1015alaska.html



 
 
***
 
 
 
 
10 - Argentina : Liberaron al violador de ROMINA TEJERINA
 
El domingo, Romina no pudo contener el llanto cuando leyó el diario que le acercaron su madre y su hermana: Pocho Emilio Vargas, el violador, quedó en  libertad el viernes 31 pasadas las 19 hs.
(...) ¿Porqué tanto ensañamiento con Romina?

Uno se pregunta porqué tanto ensañamiento con Romina. ¿Qué les cuesta liberarla?
El problema es que lo que está en juego es muy profundo. Que Romina sea liberada implica un triunfo político de un movimiento nacional y hasta internacional realmente inmenso. Y sentaría un precedente jurisprudencial diferente a lo que venimos viviendo: en Entre Ríos se ha condenado a una mujer a más de 20 años que mató a su hijo recién nacido y que lo había tenido producto del abuso sexual por parte de su padre. Condenaron también en Mendoza a Sosa, quien mató a su marido quien también la sometía a violencias. En Tilcara, Adelina Robles hizo la denuncia por abuso sexual por parte de un policía, y hoy a esa chica la están destruyendo públicamente. Es decir: las mujeres siempre son culpables cuando se ejerce todo tipo de violencias contra ella. ¿Querrá la justicia de San Pedro cambiar eso y que este inmenso movimiento obtenga semejante triunfo, y demostrar que el campo popular y el movimiento de mujeres y democrático puede imponer decisiones con sus formas de lucha? Es ahí donde está la pulseada. Romina tal vez no lo entienda. Pero ella tal vez ya habría sido procesada y hasta condenada si no existiera este inmenso movimiento.
Y uno se pregunta: qué será de las mujeres que sufran abuso sexual si Romina es condenada? ¿Quién se animará a realizar una denuncia si siempre será ella la culpable o la mentirosa? En Romina y su libertad están las miles de mujeres abusadas, que gracias a este inmenso movimiento se han ido animado a contar sus terribles historias silenciadas. Y de quienes las escuchan, han obtenido la comprensión de ese silencio, el abrazo de apoyo, las lágrimas compartidas. Y ese decir: vos fuiste víctima, no sos culpable, y queremos el castigo para los violadores y para quien te violó a vos. Basta de sometimiento, basta de que la violencia sea naturalizada, basta de que alguien tenga derecho en esta sociedad a disponer de los otros, hasta aniquilar el derecho a la libertad sexual. Basta de decir que hubo consentimiento o lo permitiste porque no te animaste a denunciar, porque lo callaste. Basta de que la mujer sufra la más ultrajante de las expresiones de la opresión a la que se la somete por el simple hecho de ser mujer.
Por esto, porque lo que está en discusión es la opresión y el rol de las instituciones ante ella (de reproducción de esa opresión, sin dudas) es que hay tanto ensañamiento contra Romina. Por eso tenemos que multiplicar las fuerzas y redoblar la batalla. Tenemos que ganarles.
F.P.

From: "apoyamos a romina" <libertadaromina@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:19 AM

 
 
 
***
 
 
 

Europe : Les femmes et la Conférence intergouvernementale 2003 / STATEMENT OF THE EUROPEAN WOMEN’S LOBBY

 

DECLARATION DU LOBBY EUROPEEN DES FEMMES

A L’ATTENTION DE LA CONFERENCE INTERGOUVERNEMENTALE 2003

 

Le Lobby européen des femmes (LEF) accueille favorablement et soutient la position suédoise, lors de la réunion ministérielle du 27 octobre, demandant un renforcement du projet de traité constitutionnel européen dans le domaine de l’égalité des femmes et des hommes. En outre, le Lobby européen des femmes présente les recommandations suivantes aux représentants de la CIG :

 

Les valeurs de l’Union (article I-2)

 

L’égalité des femmes et des hommes doit être clairement énoncée dans les valeurs fondamentales de l’Union européenne afin d’éliminer l’inégalité des sexes et assurer la pleine réalisation pour toutes les femmes de leurs droits humains. Le LEF recommande donc l’amendement suivant à l’article 1-2 :

 

L’Union est fondée sur les valeurs de respect de la dignité humaine, de liberté, de démocratie, d’égalité, y compris l’égalité des femmes et des hommes, de l’état de droit, … »

 

Justification: Malgré l’existence depuis de nombreuses années d’une législation relative à l’égalité dans l’Union européenne, l’inégalité des femmes et des hommes demeure systématique et institutionnalisée dans tous les domaines de la vie. Les preuves de l’inégalité manifeste des femmes et des hommes en Europe sont écrasantes dans l’accès aux ressources, à la prise de décision, de même s’agissant de la sous-évaluation bien répandue de la contribution des femmes à la société en générale. L’inégalité femmes-hommes pénètre tous les groupes de la société et croise toutes les autres formes d’inégalité.

 

Dialogue avec les églises (article I-51)

 

Le LEF s’inquiète de la demande de divers représentants à la CIG de modifier le Préambule du projet de Constitution européenne sur la question de la place des religions, ainsi que sur les dangers contenus dans l’article I-51. Considérant que les «Eglises et les Organisations non Confessionnelles» sont inclues dans les organismes visés à l’article 46 (concernant le dialogue civil), le LEF demande le retrait de l’article 51 du projet de Constitution européenne. Cet article accorde un statut spécial aux églises et introduit un traitement discriminatoire dans le dialogue civil.

 

Justification: Seule la neutralité de l’Etat est la garantie des libertés de pensée et de religion, condition indispensable à l’exercice et au progrès des droits des femmes.

 

Article Anti-discrimination (III-8)

 

Le LEF demande aux représentants de la CIG d’introduire le vote à la majorité et l’effet direct s’agissant de la clause anti-discrimination.

 

Justification: L’exigence de l’unanimité appliquée à des législations de lutte contre les discriminations dans une Union européenne à 25 aboutira inévitablement à des blocages et/ou des règles minima de faible portée. La vote à la majorité doit être la règle et l’unanimité l’exception. En outre, l’octroi de l’effet direct permettrait à toute personne de saisir le juge national pour violation de l’article III-8.

 

 

*

STATEMENT OF THE EUROPEAN WOMEN’S LOBBY

TO THE TO THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL CONFERENCE 2003

 

The European Women’s Lobby (EWL) welcomes and supports the Swedish position, at the ministerial meeting of 27 October, asking for a reinforcement of the draft European Constitutional Treaty in the field of equality of women and men. In addition, EWL makes the following statement to the IGC representatives:

 

The Union’s values (article I-2)

 

Equality of women and men must be a clearly stated core value of the European Union in order to eliminate gender inequality and ensure the full realisation by all women of their human rights. EWL therefore recommends the following amendments to article 1-2:

 

The Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, liberty, democracy, equality, including equality of women and men, the rule of law and respect for human rights……

 

Justification: Despite many years of gender equality legislation in the European Union, inequality between women and men remains systematic and institutionalised in all areas of life. The evidence is overwhelming that there is marked inequality of women and men in Europe in access to resources, access to decision-making, and a widespread undervaluing of women’s contribution to society. Gender inequality is pervasive across all groups within society and cuts across all other forms of inequality.

 

Dialogue with churches (article I-51)

 

EWL is very concerned by the demand being made by various representatives at the IGC to modify the preamble of the draft Constitution for Europe regarding the question of the place of religions, and also to the dangers contained in Article I-51. Considering that « churches and non-confessional organisations » are included in the organisations envisaged in article 46 (as participating in Civil Dialogue), EWL demands the withdrawal of article I-51 of the Draft European Constitution. This provision grants special status to the Churches by introducing a discriminatory advantageous position to them in civil dialogue.

 

Justification: The separation of State and Church (secular State) is the only guarantee of freedom of thought and religion, indispensable conditions for the exercise of and progress in women’s human rights.

 

Anti-discrimination article (III-8)

 

EWL urges IGC representatives to introduce majority voting and direct effect for the anti-discrimination Article.

 

Justification: The unanimity requirement for anti-discrimination laws in a European Union of 25 would unavoidably lead to blockages and/or weak minimum regulations. Majority voting must be the rule and unanimity voting the exception. Furthermore, with direct effect, individuals could bring a case to Court at national level for infringement of article III-8.

 

Lydia la Rivière-Zijdel, President of the European Women’s Lobby                                                                   

(31/102003) 




***

 

 

International

Campagne internationale de SOS SEXISME ! International Campaign ! (2001- 2005)

Chères Amies,


En 1993, la Conférence de Vienne a affirmé que les Droits des Femmes étaient partie intégrante, inaliénable et indivisible des Droits universels de la Personne humaine.

Notre association, SOS SEXISME (http://www.sos-sexisme.org/), souhaite que l'oppression millénaire subie par les femmes à travers le monde, depuis l'avènement du patriarcat, fasse l'objet d'une dénonciation officielle

et de dédommagements de la part des Gouvernements respectifs, pour que cessent, enfin, les discriminations et les crimes à leur encontre.

Nous vous demandons de diffuser notre pétition aux groupes de femmes de votre pays et de nous renvoyer les signatures avant la fin décembre 2005 :

          * par courrier
                  
(SOS SEXISME - 2 rue du Bel Air - 92190 - Meudon - France)

          * par télécopie (33 - 1 - 46261482)

          * par courriel (sexisme@sos-sexisme.org)

          * ou directement sur Internet :
                                  - texte en français : http://www.sos-sexisme.org/lesfemmes.htm#3
                    - texte en anglais : http://www.sos-sexisme.org/English/compensation.htm#3a
                    - texte en espagnol : http://www.sos-sexisme.org/Spanish/compensation.htm#3a

Les recueils de signatures seront adressés:

             - la Commission des pétitions du Parlement européen,
             - la Commission du Statut de la femme des Nations unies,
             - au Secrétaire général des Nations unies,
             - la 5ème Conférence internationale sur les Femmes.

SOS SEXISME sera solidaire des femmes qui engageront un recours, au nom de leurs ancêtres ou en leur nom, pour obtenir des excuses et la reconnaissance des crimes commis contre les femmes comme

" CRIMES CONTRE L'HUMANITE ".

Nous vous remercions de votre participation à cette importante action qui démontrera, une fois encore, la dimension planétaire de notre solidarité.


Docteure Michèle DAYRAS
Présidente

   SOS SEXISME  (fax : 33 – (0)1 - 46261482) sexisme@sos-sexisme.org

 

 

*** 




History

* One hundred years of struggle
 
The birth of her first daughter prompted Florence Montreynaud to undertake a mammoth task: to fill in the blank pages in the history of women by telling the story of the 20th century through women. (...) This has been a crucial century in which the condition of women has changed as never before. Yet all we were given were a few dates and the usual snippets of information: that General de Gaulle "gave" women the vote in 1944, and Marie Curie discovered radium with her husband Pierre.

But who had heard of Emmy Noether, who invented modern algebra and Noether’s theorem? She was admitted to university in 1900 and allowed to sit in on lectures. And in 1915 became an - unpaid - lecturer. And what about Lady Constance Lytton who demonstrated for votes for women in London in 1909 and was left paralysed as a result of police brutality? Or the Norwegian, Elise Ottesen-Jensen, who said back in 1923 that "a child must be wanted", and founded the Swedish family planning system ten years later?

When the advances and retreats of women through the 20th century are compared internationally, it is apparent that French women, in the land of gallantry, were among the last to obtain their civic rights. British and German women got the vote in 1918, but French women had to wait until 1945. It is surprising to find that in 1931 the legal status of Spanish women was one of the most progressive in Europe as a result of the left’s political victory. And in 1935 Turkish women were modernising so rapidly that Turkey was considered the "newest feminist country".

While the 20th century has seen western women make great strides - in education, the vote and contraception - it has also seen a rise in religious fundamentalism over the past 20 years. In Iraq, a law of 1990 allows an adulteress to be murdered by a male member of her family. In Saudi Arabia, women are not allowed to drive. In Afghanistan, girls are barred from attending school.

Eastern Europe also experienced setbacks after the collapse of the Berlin Wall. The number of women elected to public office has fallen dramatically (from 30% to 6% in the Czech Republic). In Poland, contraception and abortion are again a matter of debate. Prostitution is flourishing. Soviet teenagers consider it the "ideal job".

The last chapter of the book considers the year 2000 and reminds us that feminists throughout the world will be marching to protest against poverty and violence against women. Seventy per cent of the world’s poor are women. They continue to be raped, harassed and beaten.

But the year 2000 also marks the realisation of the dreams of some feminists from the early part of the century. In 1917, in the Soviet Union, Alexandra Kollontai, the first women ever to be part of a government, wanted to put an end to women’s domestic burdens by making housework a collective task. In 2000, the Finn, Liisa Joronen, founder of Sol, has achieved that brilliant Soviet intellectual’s dream. Her 2,700 employees include neither secretaries nor cleaners. Everybody shares those uncongenial tasks.

The author reminds us that dreams are a necessity. Back in 1900, whoever would have imagined that women could take charge of their fertility? In 2000 the idea of a world without prostitution or violence might seem pie in the sky to some, but others are quite capable of dreaming of it and, better still, demanding it.

by Brigitte Patzold / Translated by Julie Stoker
http://mondediplo.com/2000/06/09history

 

 *


* Nepal : Stories of women
 
The Constitution of Nepal is based on the principles of equality. In practice however this is not the case and a recent study undertaken by NGO's with the co-operation of the Ministry of Women "found that 118 clauses/sections/rules in their entirety have discriminatory legal provisions." 

-Source: Discriminatory Laws in Nepal and their Impact on Women (Aug. 2000)

Following is an example of some Nepali laws that discriminate against Women (please select each area to open the corresponding page):

  1. Citizenship

In Nepal citizenship is not automatic at birth. Women do not have the right to transfer their citizenship to their children, and thus if a child is born to a foreign father, he/she cannot be granted Nepali citizenship. Without citizenship, a person cannot gain employment, cannot access medical and cannot own property. A child who is born to rape will face a lengthy and complicated task in gaining citizenship, as their mother is not able to transfer her citizenship to them.

The Women's Foundation assists a number of women with their citizenship issues. The Women's Foundation provides legal assistance through their network of lawyers, without which it is very difficult for women to get their cases heard in court.

This is the story of a woman at the shelter who, with WF assistance, was able to take her citizenship case to court .......... 

Lila is living at the shelter and WF is currently involved in assisting her with her citizenship case.  Lila was abandoned by her husband and does not have citizenship. As she is married, she must have the authorization of her husband if she is to be granted citizenship.  After having abandoned her, her husband refuses to acknowledge her and without citizenship she will be unable to find any decent employment. In order to get citizenship, she has to prove that her circumstances should allow for this and without free legal assistance, she would not have been able to do anything about her citizenship problems.

  1. Rape

According to the existing Nepali law on rape, if a married woman is raped, her husband automatically becomes her  ex-husband. Thus she loses any marital rights, such as access to property. In most instances the rape victim will suffer rejection from her family and community. 

WF has assisted many women and children who are victims of rape and have been rejected by their families and communities. 

This is the story of a young woman who was raped and found shelter with WF.......

Sima comes from a small village in Eastern Nepal. When she was 16 years old she was sexually abused by her schoolteacher in the village. Her family and fellow villagers did not support her and she was constantly harassed. She suffered emotionally as a result. In 2000 Sima managed to escape from the village and made her way to the Women’s Foundation office in Jhapa district. She begged for assistance and was brought to Kathmandu where she lives at the shelter. Sima is currently completing Grade 10.

  1. Trafficking  & Sexual Abuse

    The definition of trafficking fails to include the act of separating a person from their legal guardian with the intention of trafficking or prostitution. In other words the law does not extend to include the culprit who removed the person from their family for trafficking. For this reason many people escape proper punishment.  

    Over 200,000 girls are currently in brothels in India. Each year about 5,000 - 7,000 girls are trafficked to India. In most cases these girls are taken from their villages in the belief that they will be sent to countries such as Saudi Arabia where they will be given work in people's homes.

    This is the story of a victim of trafficking who received assistance from the Women's Foundation.........

    Rita came to live at the shelter in June 1998. She was a resident of the Panchthar district, Subhang VDC, Ward 6.  She was a grade 6 student in a local school, but due to financial difficulties, she had to leave school in order to support her family.  

    Taking advantage of their financial difficulties, her own aunt started filling her mind with promises such as, “if you can pay 20,000 Nepali Rupees, I can get you a job in Saudi Arabia, working as a housemaid where you will earn a lot of money in a very short time.”  

     

    With these promises, Rita and her sister were sold to a brothel in Bangladesh. The people involved with the manpower agency in Kathmandu, the group that sent the women to Bangladesh, were Babu Shresth, Pawan Shrestha, Kamal Sunwar, and three other members.  Luckily these women were caught and saved within two weeks of reaching Bangladesh, and with the help of the Nepalese Consulate in Bangladesh, they were returned to Nepal.  With the help and guidance of the Women’s Foundation, they are trying to put their shattered lives back together 

     

  2. Domestic violence

We do not have law for domestic violence. Beating of women by their husband is very common. Our one research report r in western part of Nepal show that 73% women were victim of domestic violence. Here is one story of women.  

Victim of Domestic violence :

Nirmila Sitoula –Nirmila is marriage with 2 children. Her parents arranged her marriage when she was 15 years old.  (She shared while crying) – My husband is very valiant. He yell me, beat me with out reason. He do not help me in household work, He force me to work even I am very tired. (She explain one accident while crying and showing her scars) I was bringing water from well. He was sitting in the Khat (wooden bed) he was smoking cigarette but the fire on the cigarette went out. In a big pot I boiled water with husk for cows in front of our house, water was boiling.  He asked me to bring fire as quickly as he could snap or he would hurt me and then he snapped but it was not possible to reach there in that time. He came and poured on me that boiling water.  I cried very loudly and fainted. When I was a wake, I was in hospital. I know my neighbor bring me to hospital and call the WF members. The WF helps me in hospital and paid my hospital bills. They bring my husband at police custody for one month. Now I learn form WF how to produce good vegetables and sell in the market. So I am running my family independent. Our house is happy and safe house for us now a days.  My husband is not any longer with me

  1. Property Inheritance

According to Nepali law, by birth a son  has rights to ancestral property whereas only an unmarried daughter above the age of 35 has rights to

http://www.womenfoundation.org/stories%20of%20women/stories%20of%20women.htm

 
*
 

* Pornography ? NO !
 
Debbie's Testimonial

I, like so many others, knew porn was out there but it meant nothing to my life. Until one day pornography walked into my home through my daughter's boyfriend. Due to his bragging about how much money he made and the knowledge that he had dropped (flunked?) out of college and was on the computer day and night; I began to investigate through my computer. What I discovered broke my heart. This young man was heavily into the sale of pornography and actually believed it to be a smart way to earn a living without having to work too hard. I will assume that he was a victim of someone else's greed and he was enticed right out of college and into the world of pornography. Once the money started rolling in he was hooked. And by the time I discovered what he was up to my daughter was hooked on him. As I looked at the sites he runs I was appalled by the content. Just knowing that this garbage was so easily available made me sick. I know that he is nothing more than a cyber pimp and he is no longer welcome in my home. When I think of the young girls in my community that are exposed to greedy trash such as him I want to warn all the parents to throw their computers out the window and do a background check on any guy who shows an interest in their daughters. I am heart sick.

http://www.antipornography.tk/

 

 

***

 

 

Conference / Meeting

* Afghanistan : Conférence en solidarité avec les femmes

NEGAR – SOUTIEN AUX FEMMES D’AFGHANISTAN - RENDEZ-VOUS A KABOUL les 4, 5, 6 DECEMBRE, 2003


 
Si vous voulez assiter à la conference, inscrivez-vous d’abord sur la liste de NEGAR auprès d’Anne Pouget :Tel/fax :  03 84 91 75 69 ou annissima@wanadoo.fr ou annepouget@yahoo.fr

*

* Europe : Colloque Femmes et sciences

Les actes du colloque de Metz "Femmes scientifiques des trois frontières" sont dorénavant téléchargeables sur le site de notre association: http://www.int-evry.fr/femmes_et_sciences , sous la rubrique "bibliothèque" / "Comptes rendu des colloques".

 

 
 
***
 
 
 

Nouvel An / New Year


Cartes de voeux MSF Cartes de voeux MSF

En commandant les cartes de voeux de
Médecins Sans Frontières,
vous contribuez efficacement
à nos actions médicales et vous portez
un message d'espoir pour 2004.

Découvrez nos 4 collections inédites
(Paysages de France, Paysages du Monde,
Portraits d'enfants, Asie Insolite) et
commandez-les dès maintenant sur notre site :
www.msf.fr/voeux.

Merci de votre confiance.

Cartes de voeux MSF
 
 
 

***

 

Michèle Dayras
SOS SEXISME